24 July GENERATING EXTRA VALUE AND BUSINESS RESILIENCE THROUGH THE ‘SIX CAPITALS’ (2019-07-24) July 24, 2019 Business Resilience, Corporate Governance Framework®, General resilience, business resilience, CGF, SynergyGRC By Stephen Simmonds (Director: SynergyGRC) and peer reviewed by Terrance M. Booysen (Director: CGF Research Institute) In a world where the interconnected and constantly changing relationships between financial, social and environmental issues are becoming more evident, businesses that remain unaware of their impacts and dependencies on their non-financial relationships attract unnecessary risk. Indeed, these organisations also fail to recognise new opportunities for efficiency, growth, resilience and development. Resilience is a challenge for many businesses. In this article we look beyond financial and manufacturing capitals (See Figure 1), and delve into the manner in which the business can leverage the remaining capitals to deliver reliable services to customers and manage their overall resilience. Business resilience is the ability an organisation has to adapt quickly to any and all forms of business disruption, while maintaining its operations and safeguarding its stakeholders, including its assets and overall reputation. Accordingly, the measure of an organisation’s resilience goes beyond mere disaster recovery. Fundamentally, the organisations most likely to survive any form of disruption are those who consistently review their governance processes, including their operational procedures, to ensure these are capable of responding to a change event. Business continuity strategies must aim to reduce costly downtime, mitigate vulnerabilities, limit damage and restore operations as quickly as possible. The organisation’s Corporate Governance Framework® plays a crucial role in strengthening the organisation’s resilience by ensuring that business continuity management is prioritized and incorporated into the organisation’s risk management frameworks. Appreciating the capital stocks of value Environmental stewardship -- being a part of natural capital -- is not usually expressed as a form of ‘capital’ within an organisation’s bottom line reporting. This being said, with increasing environmental legislative demands, the organisation’s sustainability reporting has become interwoven with its strategic ethos. The increasing occurrence of environmental events such as global warming, ozone depletion, air and water pollution, acid rain and waste management require businesses to be able to adapt, quickly respond and recover from the negative impacts of these change events. By recognizing the importance of the natural, social and human capital, as well as intellectual capital, organisations have a far greater chance of driving sustainable growth particularly with informed institutional investors and environmental activists increasingly focusing on ethical business and governance practices. These socially and environmentally aware organisations understand the value of linking long term sustainability imperatives to their business values and drivers, making them far more attractive to new generational investors. First discussed in the King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa, 2016 (‘King IV™’), the six capitals illustrated in Figure 1 form the foundation of the business, and organisations are expected to publicly report on the manner in which these capitals affect, and or are used -- or enhanced -- by the organisation. The organisation’s capital ‘inputs’ must be transformed into ‘outputs’ which over time deliver value to stakeholders. The process of converting inputs into outputs must be governed in a manner which is ethical, fair and takes into account the reasonable needs and expectations of material stakeholders. Implementing the capitals Each type of capital includes assets that provide a flow of benefits to the organisation. By strategically considering and applying the different types of capital, organisations can differentiate themselves from their peers, make better-informed business decisions and ethically and sustainably deliver services and products. An excellent example of leveraging natural capitals to improve business resilience is found in the OFWAT project (The economic regulator of the water sector in England and Wales) which was conducted by the United Kingdoms’ National Audit Office. The OFWAT project achieved audited savings of £1.15 billion in 2014, this mainly being as a result of their recommendations and reports on improved governance practices, thereby assisting their government to improve service delivery. One of OFWAT’s four key themes in 2019 was business resilience within the water sector. To be resilient in times of flooding, a water company might traditionally build a large storage tank or divert excess flows to watercourses to prevent flooding. However, by also investing in sustainable drainage measures within urban centres, such as planting grassy verges or creating wetlands, it was possible to store, soak up and slow down the flow of rainfall naturally, thereby reducing pressure on existing drainage systems and the environment. Making use of natural capital in this way (i.e. the run-off water), OFWAT was able to derive far greater benefits, over and above preventing sewer flooding. The project was also able to create new habitats for wildlife, as well as enhance social and human capital benefits such as improved local air and water quality and enhanced local wellbeing through the creation of green spaces. Figure 2 illustrates the positive (sustainable) impact the OFWAT approach had on business resilience. By leveraging different types of capital to inform investment decisions, organisations can generate additional value and increase their business resilience without necessarily utilising additional financial capital. To conclude, by holistically considering all the capital inputs in business decision making and investment planning, organisations are more likely to assure investors, regulators and assurance providers that their performance -- be that in terms of service or financial measures -- is resilient and sustainable, and thereby encourage greater investment. ENDS Words: 894 For further information contact: SynergyGRC (Pty) Ltd Stephen Simmonds (Director) Cell: +27 (0)82 881 9389 E-mail: email@example.com Web: www.synergygrc.com CGF Research Institute (Pty) Ltd Terrance M. Booysen (Director) Tel: +27 (0)11 476 8264 | Cell: +27 (0)82 373 2249 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Web: www.cgfresearch.co.za Follow CGF on Twitter: @CGFResearch Click below to read more... Attached Files 20190724-Generating-extra-value-and-business-resilience-through-the-six-capitals.pdf 419.85 KB Related Articles BOARDS THAT CREATE VALUE: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK® By Jene’ Palmer and reviewed by Terrance M. Booysen It has been painful to watch the likes of Lance Armstrong, Mike Tyson and Hansie Cronje sabotage their futures through poor decision-making. Similarly, many organisations and their boards have failed to demonstrate strong and responsible leadership qualities to motivate and drive their organisations to success. Awareness, decisiveness and accountability are some of the business leadership qualities required to achieve remarkable performances. The ‘buck’ stops with the board of directors and it is the board of directors who are ultimately held accountable for the success of the organisation. However, with the business landscape changing at an accelerating rate, risk management and decisive decision-making are becoming more challenging and business failures more prominent. A recent Harvard Business Review reports the failure rate for mergers and acquisitions to be between 70% and 90%. According to the United States Small Business Administration, only 44% of new businesses are still in existence after four years. Against this backdrop, how does a board create a sustainable organisation in what are clearly turbulent times? BOARDS THAT PLAY THE INFINITE GAME (2019-05-27) Visionary leaders do not underestimate the power of the Corporate Governance Framework® in driving organisational culture. These leaders appreciate the importance of a governance framework in nurturing sustainability by driving values-based decision-making to “play the long game”. WHY ALL ORGANISATIONS SHOULD PUBLISH A MEANINGFUL INTEGRATED REPORT (2018-03-26) Most modern, well-governed organisations are acutely aware of the need for their businesses to be run in an ethical and socially-conscious manner and for this ethos to be communicated to their stakeholders. This being the case, it is well documented that the influential set of so-called Millennials -- unlike their older generational ‘Baby Boomers’ and Xennials -- actively support organisations whose tenets are based upon transparency, including the preservation of society and the environment. TANGIBLE BENEFITS OF A CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK® Article by Jene’ Palmer Forward-thinking organisations have realised that corporate governance does not merely fall into the portfolio of the Company Secretary. Indeed, the draft King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2016 (‘King IV’), describes corporate governance as “the exercise of ethical and effective leadership by the governing body” of an organisation. Why then is corporate governance still viewed by many organisations as a process which increases bureaucracy and drives a ‘tick box’ exercise? Perhaps the explanation lies in not understanding and appreciating the value which can be unlocked by implementing a purpose-built Corporate Governance Framework® which is tailored to the organisation. Empirical research supports the fact that good corporate governance translates into tangible and sustainable benefits for the organisation. Some of these benefits are set out below. COMBINED ASSURANCE: IS YOUR ORGANISATION ADEQUATELY ASSURED? (2019-10-01) If we have both internal and external auditors, we have combined assurance, right? Wrong! For the board of directors to claim that they have discharged their obligations to implement a Combined Assurance Model requires much more than just the appointment of internal and external auditors. DO YOU REALLY NEED A CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK®? By Jene’ Palmer and reviewed by Terrance M. Booysen We know that both local and international organisations are continuously having to adapt to operate in uncertain business environments. Locally, the release of the Preferential Procurement Regulations 2017, which places stronger emphasis on ‘radical transformation’, against the backdrop of persisting low economic growth rates are only some of the elements giving rise to further uncertainty. Internationally, the business and regulatory implications of the election of President Donald Trump and the vote in favour of Brexit and how these events will impact on local markets and businesses, is still unfolding. It therefore comes as no surprise that recent governance, risk and compliance (‘GRC’) surveys all indicate an increasing need to improve risk oversight and to balance opportunity management with risk management. The challenge lies in being able to achieve these objectives! Comments are closed.