18 August INVIGORATING THE INTERNAL AUDIT PROFESSION THROUGH ROBUST GOVERNANCE AND CONTROLS (2020-08-18) August 18, 2020 Audit Committee, Corporate Governance Framework®, General, Internal Audit, Risk internal audit, governance, audit committee, Corporate Governance Framework®, GRC, Chief Audit Executive, CAE By Jené Palmer CA(SA) (CGF Lead Independent Consultant) and peer reviewed by Terrance M. Booysen The recent public censure and financial penalties imposed by the JSE Limited on Tongaat Hulett Ltd and EOH Ltd for non-compliance with the JSE Listing Requirements, again brings the effectiveness of the internal audit profession (and indeed external audit) into question. Is internal audit adding value? The question is relevant to both the public and private sector where examples of financial misstatement and the circumvention of internal procurement policies and procedures are increasingly being uncovered. In these circumstances, questions need to be asked about the future role and stakeholder expectations of internal audit. While most organisations’ internal governance instruments (e.g. the internal audit charter) are aligned to the requirements of King IV™ and clearly outline that the CAE (Chief Audit Executive) should be independent of management and should report directly to the Audit Committee, in reality, the role of internal audit is often diluted by an ineffective Audit Committee and/or by a controlling CEO or CFO. The situation is compounded by the complexities of an increasingly digital business environment which demands a better understanding of the organisation’s strategic intent and risk appetite to enable internal audit to be relevant and effective. The typical reactive risk-based approach to internal audit will need to evolve into a more proactive approach which embraces the business’s strategic drivers and the conditions which give rise to business volatility. While continuous audits will go a long way towards assessing the consistent implementation of internal controls, the CAE and members of internal audit will necessarily also need a broader, more practical understanding of how the organisation deploys technology to achieve its strategic objectives. This knowledge is critical in ensuring that internal audit processes are properly scoped and are relevant. A superficial and mainly theoretical knowledge of industry best practice applicable to the different areas of the business will not add value in assessing the financial and non-financial controls. The Audit Committee should consider the extent to which the internal audit function may need to be outsourced to multiple service providers who are experts in their field, so as to achieve the desired level of comfort that internal controls are being appropriately applied across the business. In addition, the Audit Committee (and indeed the CAE) should ensure that the internal audit plan is sufficiently comprehensive to proactively address all areas of the business over time. The Corporate Governance Framework® plays an important role in prioritising areas for internal audit and highlighting the levels of governance, risk and compliance (GRC) maturity associated with each area. Indeed, the governance framework presents an opportunity to strengthen the second and third lines of defense and to improve the quality and integrity of the organisation’s integrated reports. The mandating of XBRL reporting and the requirement for meaningful sustainability reporting should also inform the scope of the organisation’s internal audit plan. “The purpose of an audit is to help establish and maintain deserved confidence in a company, in its directors and in the information for which they have responsibility to report, including the financial statements.” Sir Donald Brydon (CBE) December 2019 Against this backdrop, the role and value of the internal audit function should evolve to a combination of watchdog and strategic advisor in the areas of GRC. As such, internal audit will need to get more involved in the organisation’s strategic planning and risk management processes – while at the same time remaining independent. Not an easy feat! However, this approach is necessary given that internal audit is increasingly expected to act in the public’s interest across a broad range of matters and make a demonstrable impact on the organisation’s credibility and long-term sustainability. ENDS Words: 589 For further information contact: CGF Research Institute (Pty) Ltd Jené Palmer CA(SA) (Lead Independent Consultant) Tel: +27 (0)11 476 8264 / Cell: +27 (0)82 903 6757 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Web: www.cgfresearch.co.za CGF Research Institute (Pty) Ltd Terrance M. Booysen (CEO) Tel: +27 (0)11 476 8264 / Cell: +27 (0)82 373 2249 E-mail: email@example.com Web: www.cgfresearch.co.za Follow CGF on Twitter: @CGFResearch Click below to read more... Attached Files 20200818-Invigorating-the-internal-audit-profession-through-robust-governance-and-controls.pdf 254.45 KB Related Articles INTERNAL AUDITORS PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN STRENGTHENING THE GOVERNANCE OF AN ORGANISATION (2020-08-12) People who occupy positions of authority include not only executive and non-executive directors of the board, but also managers who have the means of influencing or causing material changes in the organisation. The latter, according to the South African Companies Act of 2008, are known as ‘prescribed officers’ and together with the organisation’s directors and internal auditors, can all be held liable for not ensuring that the interests of the organisation are being adequately served and protected. TANGIBLE BENEFITS OF A CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK® Article by Jene’ Palmer Forward-thinking organisations have realised that corporate governance does not merely fall into the portfolio of the Company Secretary. Indeed, the draft King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2016 (‘King IV’), describes corporate governance as “the exercise of ethical and effective leadership by the governing body” of an organisation. Why then is corporate governance still viewed by many organisations as a process which increases bureaucracy and drives a ‘tick box’ exercise? Perhaps the explanation lies in not understanding and appreciating the value which can be unlocked by implementing a purpose-built Corporate Governance Framework® which is tailored to the organisation. Empirical research supports the fact that good corporate governance translates into tangible and sustainable benefits for the organisation. Some of these benefits are set out below. INTERNAL AUDIT REQUIRE GREATER REPRESENTATION ON THE BOARD (2019-08-05) A plethora of corporate governance codes has been written across the world, and in spite of their recommendations which inter alia seek to protect stakeholder interests and shareholder value, many governance failures and organisational collapses continue seemingly unabated. COVID-19: ADDRESSING DEBILITATING RISKS REQUIRES A ROBUST GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK (2020-04-17) The times we are currently living in are unprecedented. Covid-19 has once again highlighted the reasons why governance -- good governance -- is a critical function in a democratic country. SURVIVING DISRUPTIONS IN BUSINESS CALLS FOR MORE AGILE BOARDS AND A ROBUST GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK (2020-07-23) Even prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, the ease of doing business in South Africa was already under great pressure. According to the World Bank’s annual ratings, South Africa’s ranking had deteriorated from 82nd position amongst 190 economies to 84th position in 2019. The Covid-19 saga has clearly made matters far worse for businesses to survive in South Africa, hence requiring greater board agility to weather and beat the socio-economic tsunami we are now facing. SUSTAINABILITY DEPENDS ON A STRONG GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK Article by Terrance M. Booysen Corporate governance is one of the key elements many investors consider when they reflect upon the organisation’s success, as well as when deciding upon their investment choices. But when the organisation’s governance system shows signs of stress or failure, not only do astute investors understand the unsettling impact it has upon the organsation’s supply chain, they also become wary about its sustainability which may give rise to them re-considering to ‘weather the storm’ or ‘bail out’ so to speak. Over the years so much has been written about failures of corporate governance within organisations, including the financial, social and political consequences which are typically found in its trail. Yet in spite of numerous regulation to improve the overall conduct of organisations, including the various King Codes of Corporate Governance written in South Africa, even more organisations are becoming affected by poor governance. Comments are closed.